I need to keep my response concise. I want to confirm the user's request while providing enough context to make it clear I'm engaging with their needs. I'll aim for a tight summary that hits the key points without adding unnecessary details. It's about striking that balance between being informative and not overwhelming, so the user easily understands the information. I definitely want to be helpful without being overly verbose!
\n
这条说法大体成立。上一次皇马在欧冠伯纳乌“先进球却输球”的确是对曼城：
\n
之后这些年皇马在主场很少在欧冠输球，更少出现“先拔头筹仍落败”的情况，所以把它说成5年来首次基本吻合。
需要我按赛季把伯纳乌近年欧冠主场比赛里“先得分/最终结果”的清单列一下吗？
\n
苏公网安备32058102001852
